Contents Index Search Previous Next
5.1 Simple and Compound Statements - Sequences of Statements
1
[A statement
is either simple or compound. A simple_statement
encloses no other statement. A compound_statement
can enclose simple_statements and
other compound_statements.]
Syntax
2
sequence_of_statements
::= statement {
statement}
3
statement
::=
{
label}
simple_statement | {
label}
compound_statement
4
simple_statement
::= null_statement
|
assignment_statement |
exit_statement
|
goto_statement |
procedure_call_statement
|
return_statement |
entry_call_statement
|
requeue_statement |
delay_statement
|
abort_statement |
raise_statement
|
code_statement
5
compound_statement
::=
if_statement |
case_statement
|
loop_statement |
block_statement
|
accept_statement |
select_statement
6
7
label
::= <<
label_statement_identifier>>
8
statement_identifier
::= direct_name
9
The direct_name
of a statement_identifier shall
be an identifier (not an operator_symbol).
Name Resolution Rules
10
The direct_name
of a statement_identifier shall
resolve to denote its corresponding implicit declaration (see below).
Legality Rules
11
Distinct identifiers
shall be used for all statement_identifiers
that appear in the same body, including inner block_statements
but excluding inner program units.
Static Semantics
12
For each statement_identifier,
there is an implicit declaration (with the specified identifier)
at the end of the declarative_part
of the innermost block_statement
or body that encloses the statement_identifier.
The implicit declarations occur in the same order as the statement_identifiers
occur in the source text. If a usage name denotes such an implicit declaration,
the entity it denotes is the label,
loop_statement, or block_statement
with the given statement_identifier.
12.a
Reason: We talk in terms
of individual statement_identifiers
here rather than in terms of the corresponding statements, since a given
statement may have multiple statement_identifiers.
12.b
A block_statement
that has no explicit declarative_part
has an implicit empty declarative_part,
so this rule can safely refer to the declarative_part
of a block_statement.
12.c
The scope of a declaration starts
at the place of the declaration itself (see 8.2).
In the case of a label, loop, or block name, it follows from this rule
that the scope of the implicit declaration starts before the first explicit
occurrence of the corresponding name, since this occurrence is either
in a statement label, a loop_statement,
a block_statement, or a goto_statement.
An implicit declaration in a block_statement
may hide a declaration given in an outer program unit or block_statement
(according to the usual rules of hiding explained in 8.3).
12.d
The syntax rule for label
uses statement_identifier which
is a direct_name (not a defining_identifier),
because labels are implicitly declared. The same applies to loop and
block names. In other words, the label
itself is not the defining occurrence; the implicit declaration is.
12.e
We
cannot consider the label to be
a defining occurrence. An example that can tell the difference is this:
12.f
declare
-- Label Foo is implicitly declared here.
begin
for Foo in ... loop
...
<<Foo>> -- Illegal.
...
end loop;
end;
12.g
The label in this example is
hidden from itself by the loop parameter with the same name; the example
is illegal. We considered creating a new syntactic category name, separate
from direct_name and selector_name,
for use in the case of statement labels. However, that would confuse
the rules in Section 8, so we didn't do it.
Dynamic Semantics
13
{execution (null_statement)
[partial]} The execution of a
null_statement
has no effect.
14
{transfer of control}
A
transfer of control is the run-time action
of an
exit_statement,
return_statement,
goto_statement, or
requeue_statement,
selection of a
terminate_alternative,
raising of an exception, or an abort, which causes the next action performed
to be one other than what would normally be expected from the other rules
of the language. [As explained in
7.6.1,
a transfer of control can cause the execution of constructs to be completed
and then left, which may trigger finalization.]
15
{execution (sequence_of_statements)
[partial]} The execution of a
sequence_of_statements
consists of the execution of the individual
statements
in succession until the
sequence_
is completed.
15.a
Ramification: It could
be completed by reaching the end of it, or by a transfer of control.
16
1 A statement_identifier
that appears immediately within the declarative region of a named loop_statement
or an accept_statement is nevertheless
implicitly declared immediately within the declarative region of the
innermost enclosing body or block_statement;
in other words, the expanded name for a named statement is not affected
by whether the statement occurs inside or outside a named loop or an
accept_statement -- only nesting
within block_statements is relevant
to the form of its expanded name.
16.a
Discussion:
Each comment in the following example gives the expanded name associated
with an entity declared in the task body:
16.b
task body Compute is
Sum : Integer := 0; -- Compute.Sum
begin
Outer: -- Compute.Outer
for I in 1..10 loop -- Compute.Outer.I
Blk: -- Compute.Blk
declare
Sum : Integer := 0; -- Compute.Blk.Sum
begin
accept Ent(I : out Integer; J : in Integer) do
-- Compute.Ent.I, Compute.Ent.J
Compute.Ent.I := Compute.Outer.I;
Inner: -- Compute.Blk.Inner
for J in 1..10 loop
-- Compute.Blk.Inner.J
Sum := Sum + Compute.Blk.Inner.J * Compute.Ent.J;
end loop Inner;
end Ent;
Compute.Sum := Compute.Sum + Compute.Blk.Sum;
end Blk;
end loop Outer;
Record_Result(Sum);
end Compute;
Examples
17
Examples of
labeled statements:
18
<<Here>> <<Ici>> <<Aqui>> <<Hier>> null;
19
<<After>> X := 1;
Extensions to Ada 83
19.a
{extensions to Ada 83}
The requeue_statement
is new.
Wording Changes from Ada 83
19.b
We define the syntactic category
statement_identifier to simplify
the description. It is used for labels, loop names, and block names.
We define the entity associated with the implicit declarations of statement
names.
19.c
Completion includes completion
caused by a transfer of control, although RM83-5.1(6) did not take this
view.
Contents Index Search Previous Next Legal